Mechanism

Mechanism

Cambridge Dictionary Definition

  1. a part of a machine, or a set of parts that work together.
  2. a.  a way of doing something, esp. one that is planned or part of a systsem.

Brick’s Law Definition

  1. Components, elements, or parts, and the associated energy and information flows enabling a machine, process, or system to achieve its intended result within this type of logical assembly.

Author’s Definition

  1. a part of a machine, or a set of parts that work together.
  2. a methodology including componenents, elements, parts and the associated energy and information flows enabling a machine, process or system that has demonstrated the ability to achieve its intended result.

Note: This definition is tweaked to include only proven methodologies.

© 2016 Mike Van Schoiack

Engineer

Engineer

Oxford Dictionaries Definition

Noun 1. a person who designs and builds machines and objects for a specified purpose.

Verb  1. Design and build a machine or structure.

Author’s Definition

Noun 1. a person who designs and builds machines and objects for a specified purpose.

Verb  1. Design and build a machine or object for a specified purpose.

Noun 2. a person who performs intelligent work to create entities that natural causes either cannot or cannot in the quantity, time or speed desired.

  Note: This definition in included to distinguish design vs. actualization as it seems they are often conflated, and to exclude maintenance with is typically the role of a technician.

© 2016 Mike Van Schoiack

Free Energy

Free Energy

Wikipedia Definition

The amount of work that a thermodynamic system can perform.

Author’s Definition

The energy available in a system to do work that is not controlled by intelligence.

© 2016 Mike Van Schoiack

Science

Science

Collins American Dictionary Definition

  1. the state of fact of knowledge; knowledge;
  2. a.  the systematized knowledge of nature and physical world

Author’s Definition

  1. the systematic knowledge of the natural world gained through observation and experiment.

Note: This definition of physics and chemistry excludes matter/energy with embedded intelligence because conflating science with philosophy causes confusion. 

Merriam-Webster’s first definition is “the state of knowing.” This definition applies to any field, e.g., art and philosophy. It implies that something that is not understood is not science, e.g., entanglement, dark matter and energy. I am sure that scientists would disagree. And the phrase “the science of (fill in the blank)” is commonly used even as titles of classes and curriculum in universities.

I learned that  science is about the physical sciences (physics and chemistry) and philosophy was about the mind (logic, math) by the department they were taught. However, engineering was in the school of science. But this was over 50 years ago. I see that today, the sciences are typically divided into two divisions, natural sciences and formal or applied sciences. Natural sciences are what I thought of as “science” and engineering as applied science. Applied science implies adding intelligence to science and fits the idea that engineering merges the realms of science and philosophy.

However, mathematics, now called a formal1 or applied science should stay as in the realm of philosophy as it is a mental abstraction, in my opinion.

For the purposes of this site, the term science, without an adjective, means physics and chemistry, geology, weather, etc. or natural science. 

Part of the purpose of this site is to make a clear distinction between outcomes that result from natural causes (laws of physics sans intelligence) and matter/energy with embedded intelligence resulting from engineered manipulation, and that science and intelligence are two separate things.. This is impossible to do if terminology used is not clearly defined and understood. 

The proponents of ID have argued life is only possible because of a mind, and the probability that something with the coherence and complexity exceed the limits of reason. These arguments are absolutely true and it would seem that the debate should be settled. But it isn’t. The concepts put forward offer alternative ways to think about the issues involved, amplify the ID argument, and provide means to falsify materialist claims.

Since writing the paper “On the Limits of Natural Causes”, I’ve found that many scientists think of science being a process unrelated to any particular topic. I’ve always associated it with the natural world only, thinking that is the proper interpretation, but maybe it is not.  If the definition of science is agreed to be a method of pursuing knowledge of any topic, then I would need to change the word science to physics or biology when referring to the field of endevour, or scientific method when referring to process of gaining knowledge in my writing.

© 2016 Mike Van Schoiack

Intelligent Work

Intelligent Work

 

 

Author’s Definition:

  1. work accomplished by a machine.
  2. work not solely the result of natural causes.

Background

Intelligent Work is work accomplished by a machine.  A machine’s functionality is the the result of intelligent manipulation of matter and energy to enable sensing, signaling, logical information processing and energy control functionalities.  Such manipulation embedds intelligence in the machine.

The technical definition of work is a force applied over a distance, in vector algebra:Term “work” has many non-technical meanings.  A Webster definition is:  sustained physical or mental effort to overcome obstacles and achieve an objective or result.   Another Webster definition:  energy expended by natural phenomena.  The definitions of interest here involve the expenditure of energy to cause something to happen.  In the natural word it can mean the energy of the sun to heat the earth, or the energy of wind and rain to cause erosion or energy or the energy released by burning or from a battery, or metal rusting.   For humans it might mean to build a fence, clean the house or to put out the garbage.  All these examples involve the consumption and/or release of energy that performs some sort of work.  The first list of examples involve work by natural causes, and the human examples involve intelligent work where the human is performing the function of a machine. 

Work by natural causes has no intelligence involved.  Intelligent work is a different paradigm as it can only be performed by a machine.  A machine requires embedded (logical) intelligence because it must gather information, process the information to determine action required, and have embedded means (control the expenditure of energy) to perform the specified work.

An example that is commonly thought of as work due to natural causes, but is actually intelligent work, is the sun’s energy using a process called photosynthesis to make food.  Photosynthesis is a result of both molecular machines and natural chemical reactions – this process cannot occur as a result of natural chemical reactions alone.  Here is how Wikipedia describes the area in a plant cell that performs this process: “A photosynthetic reaction center is a complex of several proteins, pigments and other co-factors that together execute the primary energy conversion reactions of photosynthesis. Molecular excitation, either originating directly from sunlight or transferred as excitation energy via light-harvesting antenna systems, give rise to electron transfer reactions along the path of a series of protein-bound co-factors. These co-factors are light-absorbing molecules (also named chromophores or pigments) such as chlorophyll and pheophytin, as well as quinones. The energy of the photon is used to excite an electron of a pigment. The free energy created is then used to reduce a chain of nearby electron acceptors, which have subsequently higher redox-potentials. These electron transfer steps are the initial phase of a series of energy conversion reactions, ultimately resulting in the conversion of the energy of photons to the storage of that energy by the production of chemical bonds.”  This is a description of intelligent work being performed by molecular machines in conjunction with some normal chemical reactions.

There are two levels of intelligent work that we regularly experience.  The first is logic level intelligent work, work that has at least logic level functionality.  This include all man-made objects but also includes things made other living things such as bird nests and beehives1.  It also includes the work done by each molecular machine in every living cell. That is a lot of machines doing a lot of work! 

Humans can perform a higher level of work: abstract intelligent work.  We can think, conceptualize, design, build machines and processes that logic level intelligent entities cannot. 

Then there must be an even higher level intelligent entity that designed us.2

Intelligent work, performed by machines, require the continual expendure of energy to power the logical functionality of the machine.  Natural work does not have this requirement as there is no intelligence.  There is a physics defined relationship between the work performed and the energy required to perform it.  Such a relationship does not exist with intelligent work because the energy involved in performance of a task involves variable, logical factors in addition to the performace of the physical work required for the task.

Understanding the difference between Intelligent work and “natural work” is key to understanding the conclusions presented herein.  Life depends upon the intelligent work that takes place in every cell.  Everything we (humans) make and do is the result of the intelligent work we do.

© 2016 Mike Van Schoiack

Process

Process

Merriam-Webster Definition

  1. a series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a particular end.

This Engineer’s Definition

  1. A series of actions or steps that result in an end.
  2. Natural Process: a series of action or steps that result in an end that does not involve intelligence.
  3. Intelligent Process: a series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a desired end.

The definition allows the term “process” without an adjective to include both Natural and Intelligent Processes.

The outcomes of natural processes are determined by their initial conditions resulting from previous natural process steps, the free energy available and the laws of physics and include the formation of atoms, molecules, suns, black holes, solar systems, planets, weather, plate tektonics, and erosion. Intelligent processes are the same except they involve intelligence that controls outcomes based on sensed conditions. 

If an end is accomplished by doing intelligent work, the process involves the use of machines and is therefore an intelligent process.  If the process only involves natural causes, the outcomes are limited by the initial conditions of previous process steps.  Life, and all creations of life are the result of intellignet processes.

All processes, including natural processes, involve changes in state of matter and energy over time, in other words a process is not a static entity.   For example, a machine, when not running is still a machine.  When it is running, it is running a process to accomplish whatever task it was designed to do.  This may seem like a trivial distinction, but it is not when discussing life.  A distinction between designed processes and natural processes is that designed processes use a local, specified power source compared to a natural process that uses free energy – energy available to do work by previous natural process steps – no machines involved.

 

 

© 2016 Mike Van Schoiack